After watching this video: http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/03/27/SCourt/R/31071/Justices+Scalia+Breyer+on+the+Constitution.aspx
I started to think about something else. Did you know that Justice Breyer voted (Castle Rock v. Gonzales) that the police did not have an obligation to protect you?, then in D.C. v. Heller also voted that you do NOT have a right to defend your self.  Now, most Justices would either say the police should protect you , or that you have a right to protect yourself, but not that “no one shall protect you” like Breyer thinks.  Another one like him was Souter (now replaced by Sotomayor).  Yes Breyer and Souter are not in favor or your safety.

Scalia said the police are not obligated to protect you but that you do infact have a right to bear arms.

The link I an sending is a debate on the original meaning of the Constitution, while Scalia is a friend of Freedon, Breyer is NOT.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 2nd, 2010 at 2:18 pm and is filed under Guns, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.